S-rule
(→X-bar Structure) |
(→X-bar Structure) |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
According to the S-rule syntax, the basic [[Syntax|x-bar structure]] can be represented as follows: | According to the S-rule syntax, the basic [[Syntax|x-bar structure]] can be represented as follows: | ||
− | XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) | + | '''XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec)''' |
For simplification reasons, the same structure may be represented by five head-driven relations, as follows: | For simplification reasons, the same structure may be represented by five head-driven relations, as follows: | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
This is to say that: | This is to say that: | ||
− | XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) := XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) | + | '''XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) := XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement)''' |
− | XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) := XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) | + | '''XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) := XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) |
− | + | ''' | |
Where X must be replaced by the eight possible heads (N, P, V, A, J, C, D, I). | Where X must be replaced by the eight possible heads (N, P, V, A, J, C, D, I). |
Revision as of 11:40, 23 March 2010
S-rule (syntactic rule) is the formalism used for describing syntactic structures and syntactic operations in the UNLarium framework.
Contents |
When to use S-rules
S-rules are used for:
- composition, i.e., creating compounds out of the base forms (such as "take">"take into account");
- periphrasis, i.e., generating analytic grammatical structures, such as in ("love">"will love")
- subcategorization, i.e., defining the number and the type of arguments of a given base form;
- government, i.e., defining the relationship between a form and its dependants, such as in agreement and case marking
- distribution, i.e., defining the order and adjacency of word forms; and
- projection, i.e., projecting syntactic structures out of the constituents.
When not to use S-rules
S-rules are not used for for affixation (prefixation, infixation, suffixation) or spelling changes, which must be addressed by A-rules and Ph-rules, respectively.
Types of S-rules
There are four types of S-rules:
- Head extension extends a given head.
- Specification creates a specifier (determiner) to the head;
- Complementation creates a complement (object) to the head; and
- Adjunction creates an adjunct (modifier) to the head.
For further information on the constituents "head", "specifier", "complement" and "adjunct", see Syntax.
Syntax
S-rules comply with the following syntax:
CONDITION := RELATION(HEAD; ARGUMENT);
Where
- CONDITION (optional) is a tag or list of tags, extracted from the UNDLF Tagset, that indicates when the rule should be applied. It may also be a relation or a list of relations in case of projection rules. The condition must be omitted in case of general rules (i.e., when the rule is always applied).
- RELATION is the syntactic relation, extracted from the syntactic roles, between the head and its argument. An S-rule may comprise several different relations, to be separated by ",".
- HEAD (optional) is the head of the syntactic structure, which is to be omitted when does not undergo any change;
- ARGUMENT (optional in case of head-only relations) is the argument (the specifier, the complement or the adjunct) of the head.
The HEAD and the ARGUMENT may be expressed as:
- a "string" (strings must come between parentheses);
- a [lemma] (lemmas must come between square brackets);
- a feature or a set of features, separated by comma, and extracted from the the UNDLF Tagset;
- a direction (">",">>","<","<<");
- an index between the left and the right side of the rule (to be specified by the syntax %name);
- an action, to be performed through an A-rule; and
- a syntactic relation itself.
Examples
Examples of S-rules:
- composition
- VA("into account"); (add the string "into account" as the adjunct of the verb)
- periphrasis
- FUT:=IH([will]); (add the lemma "will" as the head of the inflectional phrase in case of future)
- subcategorization
- VC(PP([in])); (the complement of the verb is a prepositional phrase headed by the preposition "in")
- agreement
- VS(ANUM,APER); (the specifier of the verb assigns number (ANUM) and person (APER) to its head
- case marking
- VS(NOM); (the specifier of the verb receives the case nominative (NOM)
- distribution
- VA(>>); (the adjunct of the verb comes at the right side of the verb after a blank space)
- projection
- VS(%head;%spec)VB(%head;%comp):=VP(VB(%head;%comp);%spec); (integrate the two relations on the left side into a single relation)
X-bar Structure
According to the S-rule syntax, the basic x-bar structure can be represented as follows:
XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec)
For simplification reasons, the same structure may be represented by five head-driven relations, as follows:
XS(head;specifier), which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its specifier XA(head;adjunct), which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its adjuncts XC(head;complement), which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its complements XH(head), which describes the head of the structure XP(head), which describes the head of the structure without any reference to its internal structure
This is to say that:
XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) := XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) := XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec)
Where X must be replaced by the eight possible heads (N, P, V, A, J, C, D, I).