Semantic rules
From UNL Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Templates) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Semantic rules''' are rules for mapping UNL structures into natural language and vice-versa. They can be of two different types: '''relation rules''', i.e., rules that map UNL relations into | + | '''Semantic rules''' are rules for mapping UNL structures into natural language and vice-versa. They can be of two different types: '''relation rules''', i.e., rules that map UNL relations into syntactic structures; and '''attribute rules''', which are rules that map UNL attributes into morpho-syntactic structures. |
== Relation Rules == | == Relation Rules == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ADJUNCT (DIRECT) | |ADJUNCT (DIRECT) | ||
| − | |XA(%01 | + | |XA(%01;%02); |
| − | |mod(NOU;ADJ):=NA(%01 | + | |mod(NOU;ADJ):=NA(%01;%02); |
|if "mod(NOU;ADJ)" then the ADJ (%02) is a direct adjunct to the NOU (%01) | |if "mod(NOU;ADJ)" then the ADJ (%02) is a direct adjunct to the NOU (%01) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ADJUNCT (INDIRECT) | |ADJUNCT (INDIRECT) | ||
| − | |XA(%01 | + | |XA(%01;YC(Y;%02)); |
| − | |tim(VER;NOU):=VA(%01 | + | |tim(VER;NOU):=VA(%01;PC([in];%02)); |
|if "tim(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the complement of the preposition "in" which is the head of the prepositional phrase adjunct to the VER (%01) | |if "tim(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the complement of the preposition "in" which is the head of the prepositional phrase adjunct to the VER (%01) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|COMPLEMENT (DIRECT) | |COMPLEMENT (DIRECT) | ||
| − | |XC(%01 | + | |XC(%01;%02) |
| − | |obj(VER;NOU):=VC(%01 | + | |obj(VER;NOU):=VC(%01;%02); |
|if "mod(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the direct complement of the VER (%01) | |if "mod(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the direct complement of the VER (%01) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|COMPLEMENT (INDIRECT) | |COMPLEMENT (INDIRECT) | ||
| − | |XC(%01 | + | |XC(%01;YC(Y;%02)); |
| − | |gol(VER;NOU):=VC(%01 | + | |gol(VER;NOU):=VC(%01;PC([to];%02)); |
|if "gol(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the complement of the preposition "to" which is the head of the prepositional phrase complement to the VER (%01) | |if "gol(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the complement of the preposition "to" which is the head of the prepositional phrase complement to the VER (%01) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|SPECIFIER | |SPECIFIER | ||
| − | |XS(%01 | + | |XS(%01;%02) |
| − | |agt(VER;NOU):=VS(%01 | + | |agt(VER;NOU):=VS(%01;%02); |
|if "agt(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the specifier of the VER (%01) | |if "agt(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the specifier of the VER (%01) | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
To be used when the attribute is equivalent to an existing natural language feature | To be used when the attribute is equivalent to an existing natural language feature | ||
*<nowiki>@pl := PLR;</nowiki> | *<nowiki>@pl := PLR;</nowiki> | ||
| − | + | the attribute .@pl, which stands for plural, is directly equivalent to the tag "PLR" | |
*<nowiki>@past := ET0;</nowiki> | *<nowiki>@past := ET0;</nowiki> | ||
| − | + | the attribute .@past, which stands for past, is directly equivalent to the tag "ET0" | |
*<nowiki>@past.@progress := ET0&RT1;</nowiki> | *<nowiki>@past.@progress := ET0&RT1;</nowiki> | ||
| − | + | the attribute .@past.@progress, which stands for the past continous, is directly equivalent to the tagset "ET0&RT1" | |
=== m-rule === | === m-rule === | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
To be used when the attribute cannot be associated to an existing tag and implies a morphological or orthographical change | To be used when the attribute cannot be associated to an existing tag and implies a morphological or orthographical change | ||
*<nowiki>@interrogative := 0 > "?";</nowiki> | *<nowiki>@interrogative := 0 > "?";</nowiki> | ||
| − | + | the attribute .@interrogative implies the generation of a question mark "?" at the end of the sentence | |
*<nowiki>@square_bracket := "[" < 0, 0 > "]";</nowiki> | *<nowiki>@square_bracket := "[" < 0, 0 > "]";</nowiki> | ||
| − | + | the attribute .@square_bracket implies the generation of an opening bracket in the beginning of the sentence, and of a closing bracket in the end of the sentence | |
=== s-rule === | === s-rule === | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
To be used when the attribute cannot be associated to an existing tag and implies a change in the syntactic structure of the sentence (i.e., the insertion of a word) | To be used when the attribute cannot be associated to an existing tag and implies a change in the syntactic structure of the sentence (i.e., the insertion of a word) | ||
*<nowiki>@def := NS(DP([the]));</nowiki> | *<nowiki>@def := NS(DP([the]));</nowiki> | ||
| − | + | the attribute .@def implies the generation of a definite article in the position of the specifier of the noun | |
Latest revision as of 12:35, 2 November 2009
Semantic rules are rules for mapping UNL structures into natural language and vice-versa. They can be of two different types: relation rules, i.e., rules that map UNL relations into syntactic structures; and attribute rules, which are rules that map UNL attributes into morpho-syntactic structures.
Contents |
Relation Rules
SEMANTIC RELATION := SYNTACTIC RELATION;
Relation rules are used for translating UNL relations into natural language syntactic structures. They form a special case of the S-Rule type, because:
- differently from other s-rules, the heads of the syntactic relations may not be simplified; and
- differently from other s-rules, both arguments of the syntactic relation must be coindexed to the arguments of the semantic relation through the placeholders %01 and %02, which stand for the left and the right argument [of the semantic relation], respectively.
Templates
| CASE | TEMPLATE* | EXAMPLE | GLOSS |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADJUNCT (DIRECT) | XA(%01;%02); | mod(NOU;ADJ):=NA(%01;%02); | if "mod(NOU;ADJ)" then the ADJ (%02) is a direct adjunct to the NOU (%01) |
| ADJUNCT (INDIRECT) | XA(%01;YC(Y;%02)); | tim(VER;NOU):=VA(%01;PC([in];%02)); | if "tim(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the complement of the preposition "in" which is the head of the prepositional phrase adjunct to the VER (%01) |
| COMPLEMENT (DIRECT) | XC(%01;%02) | obj(VER;NOU):=VC(%01;%02); | if "mod(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the direct complement of the VER (%01) |
| COMPLEMENT (INDIRECT) | XC(%01;YC(Y;%02)); | gol(VER;NOU):=VC(%01;PC([to];%02)); | if "gol(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the complement of the preposition "to" which is the head of the prepositional phrase complement to the VER (%01) |
| SPECIFIER | XS(%01;%02) | agt(VER;NOU):=VS(%01;%02); | if "agt(VER;NOU)" then the NOU (%02) is the specifier of the VER (%01) |
*X and Y must be replaced by lexical categories (N,A,J,V,P,C,D,I), depending on the nature of the heads.
Attribute Rules
Attribute rules are used for translating UNL attributes into natural language morpho-syntactic structures. They can be of three different types:
Feature assignment
ATTRIBUTE := TAG;
To be used when the attribute is equivalent to an existing natural language feature
- @pl := PLR;
the attribute .@pl, which stands for plural, is directly equivalent to the tag "PLR"
- @past := ET0;
the attribute .@past, which stands for past, is directly equivalent to the tag "ET0"
- @past.@progress := ET0&RT1;
the attribute .@past.@progress, which stands for the past continous, is directly equivalent to the tagset "ET0&RT1"
m-rule
ATTRIBUTE := ADD < DELETE; (PREFIXATION) ATTRIBUTE := DELETE > ADD; (SUFFIXATION) ATTRIBUTE := DELETE : ADD; (REPLACEMENT)
To be used when the attribute cannot be associated to an existing tag and implies a morphological or orthographical change
- @interrogative := 0 > "?";
the attribute .@interrogative implies the generation of a question mark "?" at the end of the sentence
- @square_bracket := "[" < 0, 0 > "]";
the attribute .@square_bracket implies the generation of an opening bracket in the beginning of the sentence, and of a closing bracket in the end of the sentence
s-rule
ATTRIBUTE := SYNTACTIC RELATION;
To be used when the attribute cannot be associated to an existing tag and implies a change in the syntactic structure of the sentence (i.e., the insertion of a word)
- @def := NS(DP([the]));
the attribute .@def implies the generation of a definite article in the position of the specifier of the noun
