Syntactic structures
From UNL Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Examples) |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
In the UNL<sup>arium</sup> framework, syntactic structures are represented by [[S-rule]]s as follows: | In the UNL<sup>arium</sup> framework, syntactic structures are represented by [[S-rule]]s as follows: | ||
− | '''XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec)''' | + | '''XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec);''' |
For simplification reasons, the same structure may be represented by five head-driven relations, as follows: | For simplification reasons, the same structure may be represented by five head-driven relations, as follows: | ||
− | '''XS(head;specifier)''', which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its specifier | + | '''XS(head;specifier);''', which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its specifier |
− | '''XA(head;adjunct)''', which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its adjuncts | + | '''XA(head;adjunct);''', which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its adjuncts |
− | '''XC(head;complement)''', which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its complements | + | '''XC(head;complement);''', which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its complements |
− | '''XH(head)''', which describes the head of the | + | '''XH(head);''', which describes the head of the structure |
− | + | ||
This is to say that: | This is to say that: | ||
Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
== Examples == | == Examples == | ||
− | * | + | *'''VH("boy");''' ("boy" is the head of a noun phrase) |
− | + | *'''DP("a");''' ("a" is a determiner phrase) | |
− | * | + | *'''JH("beautiful");''' ("beautiful" is the head of an adjective phrase) |
− | + | *'''AP("very");''' ("very" is an adverbial phrase) | |
− | * | + | *'''JP("very beautiful");''' ("very beautiful" is an adjective phrase) |
− | * | + | *'''JA("beautiful";AP("very"));''' (the adverbial phrase headed by "very" is an adjunct in the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful") = very beautiful |
− | * | + | *'''NS("boy";DP("a"));''' (the determiner phrase "a" is the specifier of a noun phrase headed by "boy") |
− | + | *'''NA("boy";JP("very beautiful");''' (the adjective phrase "very beautiful" is an adjunct in the noun phrase headed by "boy") = very beautiful boy | |
− | * | + | *'''NA("boy";JH("beautiful"));''' (the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful" is an adjunct in the noun phrase headed by "boy") = very beautiful boy |
− | + | *'''NA("boy";JA("beautiful";AP("very"));''' (the adverbial phrase headed by "very" is an adjunct in the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful"; the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful" is an adjunct in the noun phrase headed by "boy") = very beautiful boy | |
− | * | + | *'''NP(NB("boy";JP("very beautiful");DP("a");''' (the noun phrase headed by "boy" has an adjunct (the adjective phrase "very beautiful") and a specifier (the determiner phrase "a")) = a very beautiful boy |
− | * | + | |
− | + | ||
− | * | + | |
== Observations == | == Observations == | ||
+ | ;Constituents are phrases | ||
+ | :Specifiers, adjuncts and complements are to be represented as complex structures, even when they are composed of a single node: | ||
+ | :*a boy | ||
+ | :**<strike>NS("boy";"a");</strike> | ||
+ | :**NS("boy";DP("a")); | ||
+ | ;XH and XP are not the same | ||
+ | :VP("make"); = the verbal phrase is "make" (there's no other constituent in the phrase) | ||
+ | :VH("make"); = the head of the phrase is "make" (the phrase may contain other constituents) | ||
+ | ;heads are to be omitted or replaced by features in general rules, such as [[subcategorization frame]]s | ||
+ | :*NS("boy",DP("a")); = the determiner phrase headed by "a" is the specifier of the noun phrase headed by "noun" | ||
+ | :*NS(DP); = a determiner phrase is a specifier in a noun phrase | ||
+ | :*NS(NOU;DH(ART)); = a determiner phrase headed by an article (ART) is a specifier of a noun phrase headed by a noun (NOU) | ||
+ | ;heads and phrases may be replaced by unique indexes for simplification reasons | ||
+ | :indexes are to be expressed by "%<VALUE>", where <VALUE> is any alphabetic string | ||
+ | :*NA("boy";JA("beautiful";AP("very")); (no indexes) | ||
+ | :*NA("boy";JA%a)JA%a("beautiful";AP%b)AP%b("very"); (with indexes) | ||
+ | ;relations are juxtaposed | ||
+ | :*NS(DP)NA(JP); | ||
+ | :*<strike>NS(DP),NA(JP);</strike> | ||
+ | ;S-rules always end in ";" | ||
+ | :*NS(DP)NA(JP); | ||
+ | :*<strike>NS(DP)NA(JP)</strike> |
Revision as of 12:38, 25 March 2010
Syntactic structure is the configuration or the arrangement of the forms in a phrase so as to elicit its internal syntactic dependencies (such as government, agreement, etc).
Contents |
Universal Structure
The UNLarium framework follows the X-bar approach, which postulates that all human languages share the same underlying syntactic structure, whose abstract configuration is depicted in the diagram below:
XP / \ spec XB / \ XB adjt / \ X comp | head
In the above:
- X is the head, the nucleus or the source of the whole syntactic structure, which is actually derived (or projected) out of it.
- comp (i.e., complement) is an internal argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which is necessary to the head to complete its meaning (e.g., objects of transitive verbs)
- adjt (i.e., adjunct) is a word, phrase or clause which modifies the head but which is not syntactically required by it (adjuncts are expected to be extranuclear, i.e., removing an adjunct would leave a grammatically well-formed sentence)
- spec (i.e., specifier) is an external argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which qualifies (determines) the head
- XB (X-bar) is the general name for any of the intermediate projections derived from X
- XP (X-bar-bar, X-double-bar, X-phrase) is the maximal projection of X.
Representation
In the UNLarium framework, syntactic structures are represented by S-rules as follows:
XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec);
For simplification reasons, the same structure may be represented by five head-driven relations, as follows:
XS(head;specifier);, which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its specifier XA(head;adjunct);, which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its adjuncts XC(head;complement);, which describes the relation between the head of the structure and its complements XH(head);, which describes the head of the structure
This is to say that:
XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec) := XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) XS(head;specifier)XA(head;adjunct)XC(head;complement) := XP(XB(XB(head;complement);adjunct);spec)
Where X must be replaced by one of the eight possible heads (N, P, V, A, J, C, D, I).
Examples
- VH("boy"); ("boy" is the head of a noun phrase)
- DP("a"); ("a" is a determiner phrase)
- JH("beautiful"); ("beautiful" is the head of an adjective phrase)
- AP("very"); ("very" is an adverbial phrase)
- JP("very beautiful"); ("very beautiful" is an adjective phrase)
- JA("beautiful";AP("very")); (the adverbial phrase headed by "very" is an adjunct in the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful") = very beautiful
- NS("boy";DP("a")); (the determiner phrase "a" is the specifier of a noun phrase headed by "boy")
- NA("boy";JP("very beautiful"); (the adjective phrase "very beautiful" is an adjunct in the noun phrase headed by "boy") = very beautiful boy
- NA("boy";JH("beautiful")); (the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful" is an adjunct in the noun phrase headed by "boy") = very beautiful boy
- NA("boy";JA("beautiful";AP("very")); (the adverbial phrase headed by "very" is an adjunct in the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful"; the adjective phrase headed by "beautiful" is an adjunct in the noun phrase headed by "boy") = very beautiful boy
- NP(NB("boy";JP("very beautiful");DP("a"); (the noun phrase headed by "boy" has an adjunct (the adjective phrase "very beautiful") and a specifier (the determiner phrase "a")) = a very beautiful boy
Observations
- Constituents are phrases
- Specifiers, adjuncts and complements are to be represented as complex structures, even when they are composed of a single node:
- a boy
NS("boy";"a");- NS("boy";DP("a"));
- a boy
- XH and XP are not the same
- VP("make"); = the verbal phrase is "make" (there's no other constituent in the phrase)
- VH("make"); = the head of the phrase is "make" (the phrase may contain other constituents)
- heads are to be omitted or replaced by features in general rules, such as subcategorization frames
- NS("boy",DP("a")); = the determiner phrase headed by "a" is the specifier of the noun phrase headed by "noun"
- NS(DP); = a determiner phrase is a specifier in a noun phrase
- NS(NOU;DH(ART)); = a determiner phrase headed by an article (ART) is a specifier of a noun phrase headed by a noun (NOU)
- heads and phrases may be replaced by unique indexes for simplification reasons
- indexes are to be expressed by "%<VALUE>", where <VALUE> is any alphabetic string
- NA("boy";JA("beautiful";AP("very")); (no indexes)
- NA("boy";JA%a)JA%a("beautiful";AP%b)AP%b("very"); (with indexes)
- relations are juxtaposed
- NS(DP)NA(JP);
NS(DP),NA(JP);
- S-rules always end in ";"
- NS(DP)NA(JP);
NS(DP)NA(JP)