Universal Relations

From UNL Wiki
Revision as of 20:49, 15 April 2009 by Admin (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In UNL documents, relations, formerly known as "links", are labelled arcs connecting a node to another node. As they are always binary and directed, they correspond to two-place semantic predicates holding between two Universal Words: the source and the target of the relation. In UNL, relations have been normally used to represent semantic cases or thematic roles (such as agent, object, instrument, etc.) between UWs. The repertoire of relations is defined in the UNL Specs and it is not open to frequent additions.

Contents

Syntax

Relations are represented as two-character or three-character lower-case strings.

Semantics

In the UNL framework, relations describe semantic functions between two UWs. These functions are binary and directed (from a source to a target) and are claimed to be universal. Because of their similarity in name and function to syntactic relations, it may seem that the labels used for relations are different names for special grammatical functions. This is emphatically not the case. The intention is that the labels used denote specific ideas rather than grammatical structures: the idea of “something that initiates an event,” or “agent” for example, is quite different from “grammatical subject of a sentence”, even though many times the subject of a sentence will indicate the agent of the event. The agent of an event may also appear as an adjective or noun modifier, with the preposition “by” or embedded in nouns with “er” suffixes. The whole point of the conceptual relations is to have a name for these very different grammatical structures which are conceptually quite the same. Thus, the conceptual relations used in UNL are much more abstract than the grammatical relations found in sentences.

Set of Relations

The set of relations have been undergoing some changes throughout the history of UNL. The table below presents the list of relations according to the several UNL Specs.  

Set of Relations

RELATION DEFINITION 1996 1.0 1.5 2.0 1998 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 2005
agt agent
and conjunction
ant antonym                  
aoj attributive object
bas basis
ben beneficiary      
cag co-agent
cao co-thing with attribute      
cau cause                  
cnt content  
cob co-object  
con condition
coo co-occurrence
dur duration      
equ synonym    
exp experiencer                  
fld semantic field                  
fmt from-to
frm origin      
gol goal
icl inclusion    
ins instrument  
iof an instance of    
lpl logical place              
man manner
mat material                  
met method
mod modifier
nam name      
num number                  
obj object
opl objective place
or disjunction
per unit to measure object
plc place      
plf initial place  
plt final place  
pof part-of    
pos possessor    
ppl physical place              
ptn partner
pur purpose
qua quantity
rsn reason      
scn scene      
seq sequential order
shd sentence head                  
smd not semantically related                
soj stative object                  
src source
tim time
tmf time-from
tmt time-to
to destination      
via intermediate place    
Software